View Full Version : Comet Catalina (C2013 US10) January 2016
DSO Dave
January 12th, 2016, 06:53 PM
Hello forum observers.
Waiting for a peep at Catalina.
Clouded out here in Northern Ca since 1-2-2016 .
Got in some decent views in 13" Coulter on NYE and NYD between 2-4:30 am.
Was within 26arc min of Arcturus,the brightness was interfering with view.
Looked very large and diffuse, almost like a unresolved globular at 78X
Couldn't even catch hint of tail(s) however was irregular in shape.
Was a nice object even in the 80mm finder (off another scope)
Hoping to catch maybe at 4:00 am or so when clear out.
Anyone else drooling in anticipation on this one?
Please share your experience this year with Catalina.
If a Catalina thread is already up, please excuse.
Thanks group.
DSO Dave
Steve Gottlieb
January 15th, 2016, 02:53 PM
The last time I was able to do any observing was January 1st and it clouded up after midnight (from Sonoma county). Lots of clouds and rain since!
obrazell
January 15th, 2016, 04:37 PM
thought you needed that in California Steve :-)
Owen
akarsh
January 16th, 2016, 12:11 AM
I think Steve will settle for rain during the day and clear skies during the night...
I missed on Catalina too, because although I had clear skies and Bootes was high up, I forgot that there was a comet in my deep-sky frenzy... who knows, maybe I'll remember to see it in February.
Clear (Night) Skies
Regards
Akarsh
Steve Gottlieb
January 16th, 2016, 12:48 AM
I think Steve will settle for rain during the day and clear skies during the night...
I missed on Catalina too, because although I had clear skies and Bootes was high up, I forgot that there was a comet in my deep-sky frenzy
I'm guessing that deep-sky frenzy was between semesters at school?
akarsh
January 16th, 2016, 02:23 AM
I'm guessing that deep-sky frenzy was between semesters at school?
Pretty much! School is about to start, so I think you'll hear less and less from me :D
RolandosCY
January 19th, 2016, 07:16 PM
Comets should really be considered "deep sky objects", for although they are solar system objects they do appear similar to deep sky objects (think Messier!)...
1966
1967
DSO Dave
January 27th, 2016, 05:00 AM
Thanks RoyldosCY , great drawings. Look like photos to me!
I hope to see some tail if we got a clear window in Ca.
After Moon is out of way not sure how much Catalina will fade by then
Hope my view is anything like your drawings, from a good site -with decent elevation.(with my 15" and a little imagination)
Be waiting,
Dave
Preston Pendergraft
January 31st, 2016, 01:40 PM
I caught it last night, and it is still a nice bright binocular comet.
DSO Dave
February 9th, 2016, 11:14 AM
I though I might update my original post.
After weeks of ill weather, and last nights observing night scrapped due to wind-
Was able to get out with the 15" to a new darker observing spot to see Catalina fading.
Barely though, large tree had fell across forest service road.
Seeing was decent to very good, dead clear and 22% humidity at 47 degrees.
In a spot in Mendocino National Forest at about 4350ft close to Pinnacle Rock
Still did not observe the tail distinct like in RolandosCY's sketch
Still large and fairly bright.
Was dark enough to the North to catch C/2014 S2 even at about 9 degrees altitude
Looked good for being so low.
Best surprise was to see P/Ikeya Murakami for first time.
It appeared next to another object of similar brightness.
Apparently It has split?
Nothing near it brighter than mag 12 (NGC 2964-NGC2968)
The object near it had to be closer to 9th or 10th mag
Perhaps someone will confirm with their telescope before it changes too much.
Back to actual "Deep-Sky Objects"
Dave
Vic
February 10th, 2016, 11:33 AM
Hi dave!
The comet 331P/Ikeya-Murakami is fragmenting now but all of the A–F components are too faint (17–20 mag) to observe visually in 15". There are no other reports of a megaoutburst so far.
But there are several more bright comets reachable using your telescope:
C/2013 X1 (PanSTARRS) in Pegasus (~8.5 mag),
C/2014 W2 (PanSTARRS) in Draco (~12.5 mag),
81P/Wild in Taurus (~13.5 mag) and
116P/Wild in Libra (~13.5 mag).
Anyway, I consider comets DSO (not so deep but definitely Dark Sky Objects).
Vic
DSO Dave
February 11th, 2016, 06:37 PM
Hi Vic and group.
I was overzealous(and)or under-informed.
Appears after closer examination of my chart I printed for the night-
plus a visual memory of where my scope was pointed,I have no choice but to insert foot in mouth here.
Had to have been 2964/2968. (not P/2010 V1)
Brighter than I remember it last.
Was wondering why the scope was a bit East in the telrad from where my software displayed the Comet.
Not comparing field stars, I was sweeping and decided "yeah thats it"!
That's why we call it Amateur Astronomy?
Dave
15" Obsession
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.